You are now seeing a surge in the adoption of CFD into the engineering design process. CFD has been around for a number of years. It primarily has been used by CFD specialists or farmed out to the vendors. Clearly, there is still a market for this. But CFD should be and can be part of the design process. Check out the image below a guy on our team worked on recently.
It is the responsibility of the vendors to make you successful. This goes above and beyond whether the product is easy to use. It has to do with whether or not the vendor has a plan and reputation to make you successful. Let's be honest, there are alot of options out there. The decision should go well beyond the cost and ease of use. Here is a quick list of questions, I'd be asking.
How dedicated and experienced is the vendor in solving your particular problem?
Do they have examples, references, success stories?
Do they fully understand your needs?
Do they have an implementation plan?
Do they have a services group? Have you spoken to them prior to your decision?
Will your particular problem be discussed in training or are you stuck with standard non-related examples?
How is support handled? Do they have a Customer Portal or Online Community? Will you be transferred around from specialist to specialist? What does the "escalation" procedure look like?
1 comment:
Right on. Especially in the world of upfront CFD... yep, very easy to learn & drive and offering a better ROI than traditional CFD... but it still doesn't magically get used just because you own it. If your vendor is hitting you extra hard with cheapness, be very aware that they may not be able to offer the mentoring and implementation expertise necessary for you to get real value out of the investment. Probably just looking for a short-term "win" (and you can guess who's winning) rather than a long-term "win-win."
Post a Comment